Comics and graphic novels are one of the many multimodal
texts children encounter and can play a role in developing children as readers
(Collins 2008). These texts are an everyday part of children’s lives and they
expect to experience similar texts while at school (UKLA 2005). Teaching children
how to understand these texts is an issue that teachers have to tackle if they
are to prepare children for 21st century life (Harrett &
Benjamin 2009). However many teachers see the use of comics and graphic novels
as conflicting with curriculum expectations and therefore do not include them
within lessons (Lambirth 2003).
This view of graphic texts hinders their inclusion
within the classroom, having been seen as an enemy of reading for decades many
have concerns that they are dumbed down literacies (Dean 2010). Furthermore
Millard and Marsh (2001) found that due to the assumption that pictures are
only needed for people who cannot read they are seen as inferior to more
literal texts. Likewise Dean (2010) found that educators believe graphic texts require
less mental effort to decipher meaning from and therefore regard them as ‘inappropriate
and second rate in educational settings’ (pp55). This has caused them to be
called the beef burger of the literary world; they fill you up but do not
nourish you (Millard & Marsh 2001).
Dean (2010) argues that the reason that graphic texts
are seen as inferior is because teachers often have little knowledge of the texts
that their pupils read. Arthur (2004) has shown that when teachers are knowledgeable
about children's cultural capital they are able to use it to generate interest
and provide beneficial learning experiences. This is supported by Harrett and Benjamin
(2009) who argue that teachers need to change the way they approach teaching
with media in order for it to be effective.
The most important issue when choosing texts to use
with children is the appropriateness of the content (Stafford 2009) and the
images and language used within some graphic texts is seen as offensive and
over-sexualised (Millard & Marsh 2001). However, the violence and
stereotypes that can be found within these texts offer an opportunity to
address these matters within the classroom (Arthur 2004). To use graphic texts
successfully within the classroom they must be introduced so that they are seen
as a credible literary source (Stafford 2009) and as with all literary stimuli
it is how the teacher integrates it into the lesson that decides on its success
(Collins 2008).
Stafford (2009) suggests many ways in which graphic
texts can be used; these include removing the dialogue so that children have to
interpret the pictures and supply their own; encouraging children to write
their own comic scripts with directions for the artist, this method will help
to develop children's creative and description skills; and the more formal
aspects of illustration that comics employ.
In conclusion graphic texts are a rich resource that
if used correctly can be a very effective tool in teaching literacy to
children.
Bibliography
Arthur, L. (2004) ‘Popular Culture: Views of Parents
and Educators’ in Marsh, J. [ed] Popular
Culture, New Media and Digital Literacy in Early Childhood. London:
RoutledgeFarmer
Collins,
F.M (2008) ‘Reading Resources’ in Graham, J & Kelly, A. [eds.] Reading under Control 3rd Ed. Oxon:
David Fulton
Dean, G. (2010) ‘Rethinking Literacy’ in Bazalgette,
C. [ed] Teaching Media in Primary
Schools. London: Sage
Harrett, J & Benjamin, T. (2009) ‘Travel with a
Time Lord: Using Media to Enhance Literacy’ in Literacy, Vol 43. Number 3.
Millard, E. & Marsh, J. (2001) ‘Sending Minnie
the Minx Home: Comics and Reading Choices’ in Cambridge Jouranl of Education
Vol 31 No.1.
Stafford, T. (2009) ‘Teaching Comics’ in Duncan, D.
[ed] Teaching children's Literature:
Making Stories Work in the Classroom. London: Routledge
UKLA (2005) More
Than Words 2: Creating Stories on Page and Screen. London: QCA
No comments:
Post a Comment